<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>bitly blog - Latest Comments in Talking HEADs</title><link>http://bitlyblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bitlyblog.disqus.com/talking_heads/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:29:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Talking HEADs</title><link>http://blog.bit.ly/post/89178273#comment-9730938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; guys -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm seeing really odd traffic stats for some &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; URLs. The click counts are way too high. Are there other things that would cause that beyond the HEAD requests? This issue is happening this week, well after the removal of HEAD requests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a discussion about this on FriendFeed: &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/bhc3/619f00e6/something-is-very-wrong-with-bit-ly-click-counts" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://friendfeed.com/bhc3/619f00e6/something-is-very-wrong-with-bit-ly-click-counts"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/bhc3/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hutch Carpenter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking HEADs</title><link>http://blog.bit.ly/post/89178273#comment-8952010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Am having an issue between the Info stats and the Google Analytic stats.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One Click report showed 245 clicks for the month, whilst GA showed 120 visitors (not unique ones). Also, Direct traffic in GA was quite high although Twitter (where &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; is used) was very low.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The system is great and the live reporting excellent, but to be really useful we need to know how accurate it is, and GA is used as the baseline for this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndoverIT</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 10:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking HEADs</title><link>http://blog.bit.ly/post/89178273#comment-7882938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To clarify, you mean that you are not including those requests in our stats, but you are returning data to the requesters, yes? "Screening out" is ambiguous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, global trend data on HEAD requests by redirect/originator domain would be very interesting to publish, and the resulting conversation would make &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; even more of a sector leader than it already is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rafer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:24:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>